Learning room · 25 minutes
Read a historical source without overclaiming
A printable evidence worksheet: author, date, transmission, claim, uncertainty and corroboration.
Published 2026-10-05 · Editorial activity; not an accredited or specialist-reviewed curriculum.
Use your browser’s Print command (Ctrl+P or ⌘P), then print or save as PDF. Navigation is removed in the print layout. Keep the sources with your notes.
The evidence card
Choose one source linked from an article on this website. Open the source itself if it is accessible. A search snippet or a bibliography entry is not the same as reading the passage. If you cannot inspect the source, record that limit and stop short of attributing a detailed claim to it.
- Object or text: what are you examining, and where is it held or published?
- Creator and audience: who produced it, for whom, and for what purpose?
- Date: when was it produced, and when did the event it describes occur?
- Transmission: is this an original object, a later manuscript, an edition, a translation, or a photograph?
- Passage or feature: record a page, section, line or object number so somebody else can check.
- Claim: write one narrow statement that this evidence actually supports.
- Limit: what would you need to know before making a broader statement?
Worked approach: an inscription
Start with the guide to reading Libyco-Berber inscriptions, or search the library for Dougga. Record the monument and the two scripts before asking what language, title or personal name a particular line identifies. Keep the ancient object separate from a nineteenth-century printed drawing of it.
A drawing can help readers see the letters; it does not supply independent evidence for the object’s original date or context. Two modern websites repeating the same drawing are not two independent witnesses.
Test a sentence
Write: “This source shows that …”. Underline each word that goes beyond the passage or object you actually inspected. Replace broad expressions such as “all”, “always” or “proves” with a statement that fits the evidence, or find additional independent support.
Now write a second sentence: “It does not establish …”. This is not a failure of research. It makes the boundary of the evidence visible.
Compare and discuss
Find a scholarly interpretation of the same evidence. Does it use another edition or translation? Does it explain alternative readings? Record agreement and disagreement separately. Do not resolve a disagreement just by counting websites.
Finish with a citation another reader can follow and a question for further research. Send a correction through the contact form if a published claim on this site exceeds its source.
Reading behind the activity
Activity by Amazigh History. Editorial standards · Report an issue
Your notes
One supported conclusion:
One uncertainty:
One next question: